Animal Welfare – Ban Shock http://banshock.org/ Sat, 18 Sep 2021 13:29:44 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://banshock.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ban-shock-icon-150x150.png Animal Welfare – Ban Shock http://banshock.org/ 32 32 UK Business Secretary meets with energy bosses on soaring gas prices https://banshock.org/uk-business-secretary-meets-with-energy-bosses-on-soaring-gas-prices/ https://banshock.org/uk-business-secretary-meets-with-energy-bosses-on-soaring-gas-prices/#respond Sat, 18 Sep 2021 13:00:00 +0000 https://banshock.org/uk-business-secretary-meets-with-energy-bosses-on-soaring-gas-prices/

LONDON, Sept. 18 (Reuters) – The British Foreign Secretary on Saturday held emergency meetings with the heads of the UK’s largest energy suppliers and operators to discuss a looming gas price hike a number of industries and could disrupt the country’s supply of meat.

The food industry has called on the government to subsidize carbon dioxide (CO2) production after high gas prices forced two fertilizer factories to close, stripping food producers of the CO2 byproduct used to stun them. animals before slaughter and vacuum-pack the feeds to extend their shelf life. Read more

Business Minister Kwasi Kwarteng met with leaders of regulator Ofgem, National Grid (NG.L), Centrica (CNA.L) and EDF (EDF.PA) to discuss the “top priority” of energy security. saying convinced there was enough. ability to more than meet demand.

The government was prompted to act after European gas prices hit record highs after more than tripling this year, putting some small domestic suppliers out of harm’s way and threatening other interdependent sectors. Read more

“Energy security is a top priority,” Kwarteng said. “We are working closely with Ofgem and the gas operators to monitor supply and demand.”

The government said it was in regular contact with food and agricultural organizations. It also liaises with the Civilian Contingencies Secretariat which helps respond to civilian emergencies.

The CO2 shortage, which is also used to put fizzy in beer, cider and soft drinks, comes as the food industry is already grappling with a severe shortage of truck drivers, which has been blamed on the impact of COVID-19 and Brexit. .

Nick Allen, of the British Meat Processors Association, said on Saturday the pork industry was two weeks away from reaching tampons, while the British Poultry Council said its members were on a knife-edge as suppliers could not guarantee deliveries only up to 24 hours. hours in advance.

“Doing nothing is not an option,” Allen told Reuters, adding that given the exceptional circumstances, the government had to either subsidize the power supply to maintain fertilizer production or source CO2. elsewhere.

British Poultry Council chairman Richard Griffiths said he was working with the government to assess stock levels and implement contingency plans, warning that the disruption of the food supply could become a safety concern national.

If slaughterhouses ran out of CO2, pigs and chickens would be left on farms, creating additional problems with animal welfare, food supply and food waste, he said, adding: “We hope that this can be avoided with swift government action. “

Reporting by Kate Holton; Editing by Alexander Smith and Edmund Blair

Our standards: Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source link

]]>
https://banshock.org/uk-business-secretary-meets-with-energy-bosses-on-soaring-gas-prices/feed/ 0
23 cats die after fire at Florida animal shelter https://banshock.org/23-cats-die-after-fire-at-florida-animal-shelter/ https://banshock.org/23-cats-die-after-fire-at-florida-animal-shelter/#respond Sat, 18 Sep 2021 03:49:00 +0000 https://banshock.org/23-cats-die-after-fire-at-florida-animal-shelter/

ORLANDO, Florida (Nation Now– More than 20 cats were killed when flames ravaged an Orlando animal shelter on Wednesday night, officials said.

Dramatic body camera video, released by the Orange County Sheriff’s Office, shows deputies, firefighters and animal welfare officers frantically trying to save the animals inside.

The Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando reported Thursday that 23 cats were lost in the fire, but all dogs were rescued.

Steve Bardy, the agency’s executive director, called the fire a “worst nightmare”.

He told media that rescue teams were able to safely evacuate the 25 dogs from the center as they were further away from the point of origin of the fire.

“It appears the fire started in the front building of the clinic, making it more difficult for firefighters to access the (adjacent) cat room,” Bardy told news outlets at the scene. His voice broke as he spoke about the fire.

“If you run a shelter, it is literally your worst nightmare – seeing your building on fire and knowing that there are animals inside that you are tasked with looking after that you cannot enter,” he said. he declared.

Orange County firefighters have been found flames “through the roof” when they arrived at the center shortly after 10:21 p.m. Wednesday, the agency said on Twitter.

At least half of the building was heavily damaged by the fire. The cause of the fire was not immediately known.

The surviving dogs and some cats were taken to a Pet Alliance shelter in Sanford, officials said.

In a post on Facebook, The Orange County Sheriff’s Office said: “We are delighted that we were able to save cats and dogs.”


Source link

]]>
https://banshock.org/23-cats-die-after-fire-at-florida-animal-shelter/feed/ 0
23 cats die after fire at Florida animal shelter | KLBK | KAMC https://banshock.org/23-cats-die-after-fire-at-florida-animal-shelter-klbk-kamc/ https://banshock.org/23-cats-die-after-fire-at-florida-animal-shelter-klbk-kamc/#respond Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:21:15 +0000 https://banshock.org/23-cats-die-after-fire-at-florida-animal-shelter-klbk-kamc/

ORLANDO, Florida (Nation Now– More than 20 cats were killed when flames ravaged an Orlando animal shelter on Wednesday night, officials said.

Dramatic body camera video, released by the Orange County Sheriff’s Office, shows deputies, firefighters and animal welfare officers frantically trying to save the animals inside.

The Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando reported Thursday that 23 cats were lost in the fire, but all dogs were rescued.

Steve Bardy, the agency’s executive director, called the fire a “worst nightmare”.

He told media that rescue teams were able to safely evacuate the 25 dogs from the center as they were further away from the point of origin of the fire.

“It appears the fire started in the front building of the clinic, making it more difficult for firefighters to access the (adjacent) cat room,” Bardy told news outlets at the scene. His voice broke as he spoke about the fire.

“If you run a shelter, it is literally your worst nightmare – seeing your building on fire and knowing that there are animals inside that you are tasked with looking after that you cannot enter,” he said. he declared.

Orange County firefighters have been found flames “through the roof” when they arrived at the center shortly after 10:21 p.m. Wednesday, the agency said on Twitter.

At least half of the building was heavily damaged by the fire. The cause of the fire was not immediately known.

The surviving dogs and some cats were taken to a Pet Alliance shelter in Sanford, officials said.

In a post on Facebook, The Orange County Sheriff’s Office said: “We are delighted that we were able to save cats and dogs.”


Source link

]]>
https://banshock.org/23-cats-die-after-fire-at-florida-animal-shelter-klbk-kamc/feed/ 0
Help the PAWS with three cubs https://banshock.org/help-the-paws-with-three-cubs/ https://banshock.org/help-the-paws-with-three-cubs/#respond Fri, 17 Sep 2021 01:48:00 +0000 https://banshock.org/help-the-paws-with-three-cubs/

San Andreas, Calif .– Three orphaned cubs have a new, albeit temporary, home at the Performing Animal Welfare Society or PAWS San Andreas San Andreas.

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has received reports of three bears wandering near humans, without their mothers. PAWS officials noted this was unusual because cubs “naturally stay with their mothers for about two years, learning important survival skills.”

Fearing the cubs were too young to survive on their own, state wildlife officials decided to capture them. Once rescued, state wildlife officials turned to PAWS for help. The sanctuary has agreed to house the bears until they can be transferred to another facility and eventually released into the wild. PAWS also noted that giving the cubs a temporary home freed up space at a CDFW facility to accommodate other bears in need, possibly those who were injured or burned in the wildfires. disastrous of this year.

Wanting the little ones to have the best chance of survival as wild bears, PAWS says its staff take all necessary precautions to prevent cubs from getting used to humans. To enable this, the Bob Barker Bear Habitat at ARK 2000 has become their new home. Filled with oak trees and native grasses, it provides a peaceful setting away from most human activity they need, PAWS officials say.

Unfortunately, the cost of housing the bears is not cheap and the sanctuary “does not receive any government funding for situations like this, nor for any of the rescues we undertake,” according to sanctuary officials. For this reason, they are now turning to the public, asking for donations to help not only the cubs but also future animal rescues. Click on here make a donation.

Source link

]]>
https://banshock.org/help-the-paws-with-three-cubs/feed/ 0
New cats, dogs and pets available for adoption in the Southbury area https://banshock.org/new-cats-dogs-and-pets-available-for-adoption-in-the-southbury-area/ https://banshock.org/new-cats-dogs-and-pets-available-for-adoption-in-the-southbury-area/#respond Thu, 16 Sep 2021 14:25:30 +0000 https://banshock.org/new-cats-dogs-and-pets-available-for-adoption-in-the-southbury-area/

Looking to add a new member to your family and do something good for the Southbury community at the same time? Adopt a dog, cat or other animal from a shelter or local organization! Many facilities are still working to find forever homes for dozens of cats, dogs and other lovable critters.

Across Connecticut, there are thousands of homeless dogs, cats, and other pets of all ages – and many of them can be found in your area. If you’re looking for a new friend, consider checking out a local adoption agency like Whiskers Pet Rescue, where Louie the cat wait patiently. If you are not sure that you have time to care for a pet year round, many shelters also offer the option of accommodating pets until they are placed in. permanent foci.

With the help of our friends at Petfinder, Patch this week compiled a list of animals available for adoption near you. Whether you are looking for cuddles or companionship, one of these animals could be the perfect fit for your family.

Click on any ad for more information about a pet or to start the adoption process.

Editor’s Note: This list was automatically generated using The data compiled by Petfinder. If you are a local shelter and looking to see your adoptable pets appear on Patch, you will need to list them via Petfinder. All readers are encouraged to report errors or other comments to content@patch.com.

Source link

]]>
https://banshock.org/new-cats-dogs-and-pets-available-for-adoption-in-the-southbury-area/feed/ 0
The fate of wild animals https://banshock.org/the-fate-of-wild-animals/ https://banshock.org/the-fate-of-wild-animals/#respond Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:57:39 +0000 https://banshock.org/the-fate-of-wild-animals/

Earlier this year, I interviewed Cameron Meyer Shorb, Acting Executive Director of the Wild Animal Initiative. Founded in 2019, WAI is dedicated to improving the lives of non-humans in nature. Animal Charity Evaluators recently named the nonprofit one of its main charities, noting that WAI was one of the few groups working in an important, albeit underdeveloped, field.

Splice today: How did your organization get started?

Cameron Meyer Shorb: As an area of ​​cause, the welfare of wild animals grew out of a dialogue between ethics and ecology. There is a relatively large consensus among ethicists that we should prevent suffering where possible, including the suffering of other animals. Environmentalists point out that suffering is common in nature, where most animals go through difficult lives before dying prematurely from disease, starvation, exposure or other causes. But ethicists consider appeals to nature to be a logical error. Just because something is natural doesn’t mean it is desirable, as humans demonstrate every day by choosing to wear shoes and take medication to protect themselves from natural harms. Environmentalists warn that protecting other animals from natural damage wouldn’t be so simple, as species are diverse and ecosystems are complicated.

The need to act is clear, but the actions to be taken are radically uncertain. Conservation biology has made strides in informing conservation efforts for species and habitats. But attempting to improve the real quality of life for animals in the wild opens up a whole host of questions that remain largely unanswered: a scientific frontier that is as intellectually exciting as it is ethically important. Wild Animal Initiative was created to bridge the gap between the needs of wild animals and what we know about how to help them.

ST: What is your group doing?

CMS: Wild Animal Initiative strives to understand and improve the lives of wild animals. We believe the most responsible and effective way to do this is to support the growing field of academic research on the welfare of wild animals. We envision a thriving interdisciplinary community of researchers rigorously answering the questions of which animals are susceptible, what their life is like in the wild, and what we can do to help them.

Our work towards this goal currently consists of three programs. Our research program conducts fundamental research on the welfare of wild animals to identify promising methods and topics for academic researchers. Our outreach program helps researchers find opportunities to apply their expertise at these scientific frontiers. Finally, our grants program connects these pioneers with funders interested in research on the welfare of wild animals.

ST: Why do you choose to focus on the welfare of wild animals as opposed to the welfare of domestic animals? Is one more urgent than the other?

CMS: We focus on wild animals because there are so many and so neglected. Even under the most conservative assumptions, there are about a thousand times more wild animals than humans and pets combined. This means that at least 99.9% of all people living today are wild animals.

But most of the efforts that we think of as helping wildlife are actually aimed at helping species or ecosystems. Hardly anyone approaches it from the point of view of the individuals themselves: what would wild animals ask of us if they could? Preserving habitats or species may be part of the answer, but it is not the complete answer, as most wild animals struggle to survive even under natural conditions.

While the overwhelming majority of animals live in the wild, building a better future requires considering both the welfare of animals in captivity and the welfare of wild animals. Society cannot take the lives of wild animals seriously if they ignore the suffering of domestic animals. Factory farming must therefore cease. But the end of factory farming has uncertain consequences for wild animals. What happens to the vast expanses of land currently consumed by animal feed production will determine the number and well-being of the wild animals that end up living there.

Mitigating climate change will also require massive changes in land use as we increase renewable energy production and carbon sequestration. Either way, the next few decades will be a turning point for captive and wild animals. Advancing the science of wildlife welfare is the only way to ensure that this historic transition benefits as many people on Earth as possible.

ST: How has the animal movement at large reacted to your work?

CMS: The larger animal rights movement has been a constant source of support for our mission. Of course, it helps that animal advocates care deeply about non-human animals. But just as important, it is a movement of people open to new ideas. Many animal advocates can point to a time when learning to factory farm led them to see the world in a whole new way, including radically changing their diet and lifestyle. These people are exceptionally willing to learn that life in the wild is not as idyllic as it once thought, and they are motivated to take action to change the status quo.

The larger animal rights movement has made a real difference to our cause every step of the way. Animal ethicists were among the first to articulate the problem of suffering in wild animals and the obligation to prevent it. From the earliest days of the Wild Animal Initiative as a non-profit organization, Animal Advocates have supported our operations by sharing professional advice and donating to our organization. For example, Encompass helped us operationalize racial equity in our organization whenever they could do so without undermining their primary focus on farm animal welfare organizations.

Most importantly, in 2020, Animal Charity Evaluators (ACE) intensively examined our profitability, adaptability, and need for additional funding. They concluded that we are one of the top four charities where they believe donor dollars can go the most to help animals. This was the first time ACE has awarded Top Charity status to a wildlife organization. Historically, ACE has focused on charities that reduce the harms of factory farming, for example by improving agricultural welfare standards, advocating plant-based diets, or accelerating the growth of the industry. alternative proteins. While we are far from the first organization to care about wildlife, ACE underscored our strategic and wellness-focused approach.

ST: What are the policy proposals, both modest and ambitious, that will alleviate the suffering of wild animals?

CMS: The most valuable thing policy makers can do to improve the welfare of wild animals is to invest in rigorous research into the most responsible and cost-effective ways to do it. A better understanding of how to measure well-being and take into account the trade-offs between different species will open up much more sustainable and scalable ways to help them. In the meantime, the diversity of wild animals also offers many different opportunities to help them in the short term. We are optimistic that while all of these issues cannot be resolved, many can. Here are some approaches that already look promising:

Make existing interactions more human. Humans kill many wild animals through agricultural pest control, urban pest control, commercial fishing, etc. We could prevent or eliminate much of the pain of these deaths by finding ways to share space, using non-lethal management methods such as birth control, or using less painful pesticides or fishing methods.

Reduce disease. The scientific community has made huge strides in reducing the burden of disease on humans and pets. These same techniques could be extended to protect wild animals from the most noxious or painful diseases.

Provide better habitat. Some landscapes are better for animals than others. As we restore habitats for biodiversity, plant forests for carbon sequestration, or otherwise alter landscapes, we should try to incorporate changes that create more opportunities for more animals to live good lives, all by limiting the risk of creating environments where survival is a struggle.

Source link

]]>
https://banshock.org/the-fate-of-wild-animals/feed/ 0
Pigs on the move: autonomous pigsties https://banshock.org/pigs-on-the-move-autonomous-pigsties/ https://banshock.org/pigs-on-the-move-autonomous-pigsties/#respond Sat, 11 Sep 2021 07:07:24 +0000 https://banshock.org/pigs-on-the-move-autonomous-pigsties/ Does keeping pigs in mobile, self-contained animal facilities look futuristic to you? Not according to a recent Canadian initiative.

Canadian farmer and technologist Daniel Badiou from Ukko Robotics designed an outdoor mobile unit for pig production. He and his partner Katrina Jean-Laflamme had already developed a “robotic barn” to house and protect pasture-raised chickens and believed that this should work for pigs as well.

The company’s Rova barn is a mobile and autonomous pet store. It protects animals from the elements, provides them with additional water and food, and gradually moves through a field, exposing animals to new grass daily. Ventilation can be controlled to ensure the animals are as comfortable as possible in the prevailing weather conditions.

Take a peek inside one of the mobile pigsties.  - Photo: Ukko Robotics

Take a peek inside one of the mobile pigsties. – Photo: Ukko Robotics

After more than 2 years of testing on their home farm in Manitoba, the team concluded that this allows small farms to raise pigs on grass. The pigs were observed not to fight as much and the tail bites were gone, Badiou said in a press release.

Mobile pigsty of different sizes

The mobile barn is available in different sizes. The largest will house around 50 pigs, depending on the desired stocking density. Units require a minimum of 7 acres (2.8 ha) of pasture to operate. Depending on the size of the unit, each can hold 5-7 days of food and water. Food and water deliveries can be made with an all-terrain vehicle pulling a small trailer.

Stables can be programmed to move at different speeds depending on stocking density, terrain and pasture / grass condition. Each day, units typically move between 6 and 30 feet (1.8 m to 9.1 m). When a unit reaches the end of a field, the manager uses a remote control to put the unit in manual mode and turn it around. Operation is fully automated. Units recognize when they have reached the end of a field and automatically turn and walk to a new section of the field.

The exterior of a pig mobile home looks a lot like regular mobile homes.  - Photo: Ukko Robotics

The exterior of a pig mobile home looks a lot like that of regular mobile homes. – Photo: Ukko Robotics

The barns have solar charging with sufficient battery capacity to operate up to 5 days without sunlight. The units are designed to operate even during the harsh northern winters experienced in places like Manitoba.

Well-being and sustainability issues

By moving animals evenly over sections of pasture, the system is said to reduce overgrazing and over-fertilization. This, according to the press release, contributes to soil health and allows farmers to adopt regenerative farming practices with reduced labor. It also allows farmers to experiment with different grasses and cover crops to determine the best nutrition for pigs.

Each unit is equipped with sensors to monitor the consumption and watering activity of the animals.

In the press release, Badiou called the design “a great promotional tool for farms on the outskirts of large urban areas that serve customers interested in animal welfare and sustainable agriculture.”

Source link

]]>
https://banshock.org/pigs-on-the-move-autonomous-pigsties/feed/ 0
Senator Booker’s legislation aims to reform U.S. farming systems – Food Tank https://banshock.org/senator-bookers-legislation-aims-to-reform-u-s-farming-systems-food-tank/ https://banshock.org/senator-bookers-legislation-aims-to-reform-u-s-farming-systems-food-tank/#respond Wed, 08 Sep 2021 07:00:16 +0000 https://banshock.org/senator-bookers-legislation-aims-to-reform-u-s-farming-systems-food-tank/

US Senator Cory Booker recently reintroduced The Agricultural System Reform Act restrict the growth of new factory farms and protect family farmers.

Approximately 20,000 Contained Animal Feeding (CAFO) operations are currently operating in the United States. CAFOs are large-scale industrial facilities that rear thousands of animals under conditions that are harmful to public health, the environment, and animal welfare.

The Farm System Reform Act was first introduced in the United States Senate in 2019. Since then, Booker has enjoyed a wide range of support from family farm and ranch advocates, environmental justice groups and the animal welfare, public health agencies and unions related to the meat packing industry.

“From rural communities to public health to the environment, factory farming continues to have a detrimental impact on almost every aspect of our lives, and I am encouraged to see a broad coalition of stakeholders supporting the efforts. transition to a more sustainable and humane system, ”Booker told Food Tank.

Farm System Reform Act aims to ban new CAFOs from forming and phasing out larger CAFOs by 2040, holding large corporations accountable for pollution caused by CAFO practices, creating $ 100 billion fund of US dollars to buy back farmers who want to leave the operation of a CAFO. , and strengthen the protections of family farmers by reinstating the law on packers and stockyards.

Public support for a CAFO moratorium is increasing in states like Iowa, where CAFOs are prevalent and Rapidly expanding. A recent survey conducted by the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future finds that nearly two-thirds of Iowans want a moratorium on CAFOs. Iowa lawmakers have also repeatedly introduced legislation to push for a statewide moratorium on CAFOs, including in 2021.

Iowa faces a big environmental and public health consequences due to CAFOs, including pollution of waterways that close beaches and kill fish, volatile odors that impact psychological health, and the significant increase in asthma in children and adults. These environmental and health effects are common in the areas Surrounding CAFOs, which are disproportionately located in minority communities.

A 2021 study from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that air pollution from animal agriculture is responsible for 12,720 deaths in the United States per year. Despite these major concerns, actors in the industrial agriculture supply chain are exempt from declaring the environmental impact.

Joe Maxwell, President and CEO of Family Farm Action and a sixth generation farmer, told Food Tank: “These big companies are externalizing the environmental costs to taxpayers, communities and farmers, and claim to have meat to eat. an affordable price.” While farmers may be interested in adopting more sustainable practices, meat packers make this impossible by pushing farmers to maximize production to an unsustainable level.

According to the US Department of Agriculture, family farmers median net income of $ 1,840 negative in 2018. With only four companies controlling 85 percent of the livestock market and 65 percent of the pork market, farmers have few options and are often forced to accept prices below the cost of raising animals.

“You can look at all sectors of animal agriculture and you will find a handful of multinational companies controlling this market space,” Maxwell told Food Tank.

Asked about the importance of federal support for farmers looking to move away from the CAFO model, Maxwell said, “That’s it. Farmers want an option, they are looking for a way out. It is imperative that we start removing some of the current subsidies from the model of industrial agriculture that has put farmers on a treadmill that they cannot get rid of.

The Farm System Reform Act would also strengthen the Packers and Stockyard Act of 1921, which was originally designed to protect farmers against unfair and anti-competitive trading practices. In addition to enhancing market transparency, farmers would be protected from retaliatory practices if they took legal action against a company that caused them harm.

While there is little chance of passing the bill in its entirety this session, Booker sees potential for progress. For example, Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, introduced bipartite legislation it is almost identical to the section on the Slaughterhouses and Stockyards Act in the Farm System Reform Act. And as a newly appointed member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, Booker is well positioned to lead the change for the long haul.

“The large multinational meat packers, because of their purchasing power and size, put our food system at risk and harm everyone along the supply chain,” Booker told Food Tank . “We need to fix the broken system – this means giving family farmers and ranchers a fair chance and holding business integrators accountable for the damage they cause. “

Join the conversation:

Source link

]]>
https://banshock.org/senator-bookers-legislation-aims-to-reform-u-s-farming-systems-food-tank/feed/ 0
The horse dies on the “Ponniyin Selvan” sets; Animal Care Council Seeks Investigation Based on PETA Complaint Against Mani Ratnam’s Madras Talkies https://banshock.org/the-horse-dies-on-the-ponniyin-selvan-sets-animal-care-council-seeks-investigation-based-on-peta-complaint-against-mani-ratnams-madras-talkies/ https://banshock.org/the-horse-dies-on-the-ponniyin-selvan-sets-animal-care-council-seeks-investigation-based-on-peta-complaint-against-mani-ratnams-madras-talkies/#respond Sat, 04 Sep 2021 07:06:31 +0000 https://banshock.org/the-horse-dies-on-the-ponniyin-selvan-sets-animal-care-council-seeks-investigation-based-on-peta-complaint-against-mani-ratnams-madras-talkies/

Poster by Ponniyin Selvan

A complaint has been filed against the production company Madras Talkies of Mani Ratnam by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) following reports of the death of a horse on the sets of Ponniyin Selvan, the filmmaker’s next historical film. Based on this complaint, the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) requested an investigation into the horse’s death, PETA noted in a press release on Friday.

PETA India said it filed the complaint based on a whistleblower report that a horse died on the Ponniyin Selvan sets after being involved in a “head-on collision” while filming.

According to a PTI report in Hindustan times, the complaint was registered by a PETA India volunteer on August 18. It indicated that a horse had died on private land near a film studio, where the filming of Ponniyin Selvan took place on August 11.

Based on this complaint, an FIR was registered against Madras Talkies and the owner of the horse under section 11 of the PCA Act of 1960 and section 429 of the Indian Penal Code of 1860 at the Police Station of ‘Abdullapurmet in Telangana.

An official attached to the Abdullapurmet police station said PTI that a veterinarian has performed an autopsy on the horse and that a report is still awaited.

Following PETA’s complaint, AWBI ordered the Hyderabad District Collector and the Telangana State Animal Care Council to investigate the horse’s death. According to PETA, the owner of the horse allowed the directors of the film to continue using the animal while it was tired and dehydrated.

In its statement, PETA India also urged the entertainment and marketing industries to use “computer generated images, visual effects and animatronics instead of forcing live animals to perform.” The organization also announced a ransom of Rs 25,000 to anyone who could provide a video or photograph of the incident on the Ponniyin Selvan sets.

Ponniyin Selvan is jointly produced by Mani Ratnam’s Madras Talkies and Lyca Productions. The film has music by Ratnam’s regular composer AR Rahman and features a large star-studded cast. It is based on the Tamil historical novel, Ponniyin Selvan, written by Kalki (pen name of Tamil writer Ramaswamy Krishnamurthy). The five-volume novel tells the fictional story of the early days of Arulmozhivarman, who later became Emperor Chola Rajaraja Chola I.

Source link

]]>
https://banshock.org/the-horse-dies-on-the-ponniyin-selvan-sets-animal-care-council-seeks-investigation-based-on-peta-complaint-against-mani-ratnams-madras-talkies/feed/ 0
Game changer for the fur industry ensuring animal welfare and environmental standards, responding to reviews https://banshock.org/game-changer-for-the-fur-industry-ensuring-animal-welfare-and-environmental-standards-responding-to-reviews/ https://banshock.org/game-changer-for-the-fur-industry-ensuring-animal-welfare-and-environmental-standards-responding-to-reviews/#respond Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:00:00 +0000 https://banshock.org/game-changer-for-the-fur-industry-ensuring-animal-welfare-and-environmental-standards-responding-to-reviews/

LONDON, September 1, 2021 / PRNewswire / – Customers Now Have the Green Light to Buy and Wear Natural Fur with Confidence With the Launch of a Comprehensive Global Certification and Traceability System That Ensures Animal Welfare and Environmental Standards, Furmark®. In the industry’s biggest upheaval to date, the fur trade is transforming the way it processes natural fur throughout its supply chain.

Available worldwide and developed by the International Fur Federation (IFF) – with input from LVMH Group (the world’s largest luxury goods conglomerate) and key brands – Furmark® the products are traceable, verified and guaranteed to comply with recognized standards.

Furmark® will change the perception of fur and open up fur to a whole new market and audience: it responds to the unfounded accusations of opponents of fur. Industry, industry leaders, scientists, sustainability managers and wellness experts have come together to agree on a set of recognized standards – based on science, independent inspection and transparency – and a global labeling scheme which aims to modernize natural fur.

Furmark®-Certified products have a unique alphanumeric tag code that provides full traceability details (fur type; fur origin, animal welfare program; manufacturer; and place of manufacture), ensuring consumers can purchase natural fur with confidence.

Furmark® certification means consistent standards throughout the supply chain: it only incorporates natural wild or farmed fur from major animal welfare programs (including the first animal welfare program promoted by the European Commission’s self-regulation and co-regulation initiative, WelFur) sold through the auction system.

Fully certified products must be processed by accredited dressers and dyers who meet the SafeFur standard (covering durability, chemical use, emissions and product safety) which includes third party testing. Furmark®-Certified products can only be manufactured by companies that have successfully passed due diligence checks carried out by brand protection and anti-counterfeiting experts. Each step of the process is recorded via a traceability component accessible to the customer, ensuring transparency throughout the supply chain.

Every animal welfare and sustainability program has a detailed protocol or standard, independently developed and based on science. The respective programs are then subjected to a third party evaluation and certified by a recognized certification body. Strict and active enforcement is ensured through visits and assessments: those who do not meet the standards are excluded from the certification program and the Furmark® system.

A new global study has shown that 70% of the public are “open” in one form or another to designers and brands using natural fur. A majority (65%) of these people responded positively to Furmark® and more than half (56%) say it changes their view of natural fur “very positively” or “positively”.

Marc Oaten, CEO of IFF, said: “This is a game changer: if people had any doubts about buying or wearing natural fur, then they got a response with Furmark®. “

“Our centuries-old business is undergoing its most significant transformation to date; traceable and sustainable products represent the real alternative to “fast fashion”. “

It guarantees animal welfare and environmental standards and demonstrates our common ambition to deliver transparent and easy-to-understand certification. This means, in short, that people can confidently buy durable natural fur.

“Furmark® provides global and recognized standards, directly to the consumer. “

NOTES TO EDITORS

The International Fur Federation (IFF), established in 1949, represents and regulates the global fur industry. It has 56 member associations in more than 40 countries around the world. The Federation promotes the sustainable natural fur trade and, as such, actively works to develop, implement and advance animal welfare and environmental standards.

The LVMH Group has brought invaluable expertise and time over the past 4 years to help develop the Furmark® program: alongside other industry experts and stakeholders, sustainability professionals from both groups have provided comments and comments on the requirements defined in the protocols defining the standards and certification programs. recognized under the Furmark program and shared their standards on the safe use of chemicals in dyeing fur. Brands have also collaborated with traceability platforms, including the ChainPoint system, through the provision of data to develop a robust reporting process. This work is supported by the Furmark® Steering Group, which follows strict governance rules.

Research cited: 5,000 adults; key markets – United States, United Kingdom, Italy, France, and Spain; March-April 2021; Mitchla Marketing on behalf of the IFF.

For more details on Furmark®, please visit furmark.com.

SOURCE Furmark®

Related links

https://www.furmark.com

Source link

]]>
https://banshock.org/game-changer-for-the-fur-industry-ensuring-animal-welfare-and-environmental-standards-responding-to-reviews/feed/ 0