Ban Shock Collars – Ban Shock Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:49:58 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Ban Shock Collars – Ban Shock 32 32 Kennel Club urges government to move forward on plan to ban shock collars Tue, 18 May 2021 14:49:24 +0000

Animal health

Following a failed legal challenge to their ban in court, the Kennel Club is urging the government to move forward with its plan to ban shock collars.

On May 14, the appeals court ruled that Defra’s decision to ban the necklaces was neither illogical nor unreasonable.

“The Kennel Club urges the government to move forward with its plan to ban shock collars. “

The Kennel Club’s director of public affairs, Ed Hayes, said: “The judgment of the Court of Appeal should be the last step on this relentless road to ban the use of electric collars in England and we have written to the Minister. to urge him. that strong words and commitments quickly turn into action. We are delighted that the government has made a commitment to ban these unnecessary and cruel devices in its action plan. Research shows that a reward-based approach is more effective than delivering painful electric shocks when training dogs and leading veterinary organizations in the UK and Europe oppose shock collars. We have been lobbying the UK government and decentralized administrations a lot for years on this issue. The government had previously pledged to ban these harmful devices; however, the legal challenge, which has now finally been closed, had significantly delayed Defra from taking action. There is no more room to lose momentum in favor of the ban. “

See all the latest animal health jobs

Source link

]]> 0
Manufacturers defend electronic collars as ban looks looming, Pet Business World UK’s Pet Trade News & Events Tue, 18 May 2021 08:11:23 +0000

The Kennel Club has written to DEFRA Minister Zac Goldsmith calling for swift action to implement a ban on the use of so-called ‘shock’ collars in England, following a court ruling appeal last week that dismissed an appeal from the Association of Electronic Collar Manufacturers and Petsafe.

The outcome of the legal challenge, which previously delayed DEFRA from any legislative action, saw the appeal dismissed as the government presented evidence to show that electric collars can have a detrimental effect on the welfare of dogs .

But a spokesperson for the Electronic Collar Manufacturers Association disputed the evidence and said there was a “growing coalition” in favor of electronic collars – including vets.

“The Kennel Club has failed to persuade the Scottish government to ban electronic collars and will face the same fate in England,” ECMA said yesterday.

“This is because the research at the University of Lincoln, upon which the Kennel Club relies, has been dismissed by top academics as” very seriously flawed. “

“The Kennel Club is also aware that questions have been raised in Parliament as to why researchers at Lincoln did not disclose that they campaigned for a ban on training on electronic collars prior to conducting their research. .


The association also said Defra faces the “ problem ” of how to explain why Cabinet Minister Therese Coffey was using an electronic collar on her dog while she was still Minister for Defra.

The Kennel Club called the move a “crowning glory” after the government also announced a new animal welfare action plan last week.

Dr Ed Hayes, Head of Public Affairs at The Kennel Club, said: ‘This flagship plan aims to ensure the UK leads the way in animal welfare and includes a ban on the use of discharge collars. electric, a measure that has lasted a long time. campaigned for the Kennel Club.

“The judgment of the Court of Appeal should be the last step on this relentless road to ban the use of electric necklaces in England and we have written to the Minister to insist that the strong words and the commitments made be quickly converted into action. .


“We are delighted that the government has made a commitment to ban these unnecessary and cruel devices in its action plan; research shows that a reward-based approach is more effective than delivering painful electric shocks when training dogs and major veterinary organizations in the UK and Europe oppose shock collars.

“We have been lobbying the UK government and decentralized administrations a lot for years on this issue. The government had previously pledged to ban these harmful devices, but the legal challenge, which was ultimately closed, significantly delayed DEFRA’s action.

“There is no more room to lose the momentum forward by causing the ban.”

The Kennel Club has claimed that DEFRA-funded research has shown that electronic collars could have a detrimental effect on dog welfare by causing them unnecessary harm and suffering, with 25% of dogs trained with dog collars. shock showing signs of stress.

The use and sale of electric shock collars is currently NOT prohibited in England, with Wales being the only country to have regulations in place which prohibit their use.


In Scotland there are guidelines against the use of electronic collars, but the Kennel Club is lobbying Holyrood to explicitly ban them through legislation.

The Electronic Collar Manufacturers Association said there was a “ growing coalition ” in favor of retaining electronic collars as a key deterrent to dogs that have escaped human control from attacking sheep.

They include veterinarians, who wrote to The Times saying “the welfare consequences of a ban on these collars would be appalling.” There is also an international scientific consensus behind the effectiveness of electronic necklaces.

They are supported by the National Sheep Association and the Countryside Alliance – as does Lord Botham, who this month wrote an article in the Telegraph in which he revealed that the Kennel Club had admitted that he had no evidence ‘of ” intentional or unintentional abuse or abuse. all types of electronic training aids ”.

“The Kennel Club is showing up on the issue. If he had an ounce of intellectual credibility, he would call for a ban on cattle fencing, which are thousands of times more powerful than electronic collars.

Source link

]]> 0
Council chiefs support ban on shock collars Sun, 16 May 2021 14:12:12 +0000

Renfrewshire councilors must call for a ban on shock collars for dogs.

A motion was put forward by Councilor Andy Doig and Councilor Eileen McCartin, urging their elected colleagues to agree to write to the Scottish Animal Welfare Commission with the aim of having the controversial devices banned at the “first opportunity”.

Collars can be used as a way to train dogs and work by delivering an electrical charge to control their behavior.

But many believe the method is cruel, with devices capable of delivering shocks of up to 6,000 volts.

The Scottish government promised to ban the necklaces in 2018 but, three years later, it is still legal to use them.

In 2017, the Renfrewshire Council agreed to write to ministers asking for a ban, suggesting the devices “have no place” in modern dog training.

But, since then, no real progress has been made, which has prompted Councilor Doig to re-press the council’s cause.

He said: “I think things have changed a lot over the past 50 years. People thought the best way to train a dog was to show them who the boss is, but now people have come to accept that if we are to build a relationship with a dog we have to do it in a positive way.

“Dogs are often seen as family members of people and we need to change the way we look at them. We don’t hit kids anymore, so why should we punish dogs like that?

The Scottish government has stressed that it does not condone the use of impact collars as training devices, but legislation to make them illegal has yet to be put in place.

The motion to be presented to the Renfrewshire Council at a meeting tomorrow states that it “regrets the Scottish Government’s prevarication on the issue of banning impact collars”.

Source link

]]> 0
Government bans electric dog collars Fri, 14 May 2021 11:34:13 +0000

The UK government has presented its plans to ban electric dog collars as part of its animal welfare action plan.

The move has been widely praised by pet associations, such as the Kennel Club, for ensuring the UK leads the way in animal welfare.

Research by the Ministry of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) has found that electronic collars can have a detrimental effect on the well-being of dogs by causing them unnecessary harm and suffering.

In the public body’s study, about 25% of dogs trained with shock collars showed signs of stress.

Dr Ed Hayes, Head of Public Affairs at The Kennel Club, said: “We fully support a total ban on both the use and sale of electric collars and we are pleased that the government has committed to this. its proactive action plan.

“These devices cause unnecessary pain and suffering to dogs, and research has shown that a reward-based approach is more effective than delivering painful electric shocks when training dogs. Major veterinary organizations in the UK and Europe are aligned in their opposition to impact collars. “

Source link

]]> 0
Battersea welcomes government action plan recognizing animal welfare Thu, 13 May 2021 07:00:00 +0000

Leading animal welfare charity Battersea this week welcomed new government plans to improve the lives of animals in the UK and abroad.

During a visit to the iconic Battersea center in London, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Rt Hon George Eustice MP launched the Wellbeing Action Plan animal welfare to improve animal welfare in the UK and abroad.

The action plan will see several new laws and non-legislative changes come into effect over the coming months. The first of these is a new Animal Welfare Bill (Sentience), which recognizes animals as sentient beings, which will be presented to Parliament this week and will be followed by other measures which include; banning live animal exports, cracking down on pet theft and puppy smuggling, and introducing mandatory microchipping for owned cats.

Battersea Managing Director Peter Laurie said:

“Battersea is excited about the new Animal Welfare Action Plan and the difference it can make. Throughout the year, we see firsthand the impact of puppy smuggling, welcome hundreds of stray dogs and cats, and support owners who have lost their beloved pets.

“Every dog ​​and cat deserves to be safe from harm, which means cracking down on those who sell animals illegally and under poor welfare conditions, being proactive in protecting owners from the devastation of their pets. lost or stolen, and do everything we can to bring them together.

“Our pets are not only sentient beings, but much loved family members, and we support all measures that will protect them from unnecessary suffering and reassure dog and cat owners, now and in the future. . “

Battersea frequently welcomes dogs that have likely been raised in poor conditions before being sold to unsuspecting owners. During his visit to Battersea, the Secretary of the Environment met Phoenix, a 6 month old Border Terrier, who arrived in Battersea after being left on a London property by a puppy merchant. His microchip was shown to have been bred in Northern Ireland before being supplied to a dealer for sale, puppy imports have skyrocketed to meet demand under lockdown, and Battersea is hoping the increase in the age of a puppy or kitten can be imported into the UK at six months will ensure a crackdown on those who put profit before animal welfare.

Battersea is also happy to see the government’s plans to introduce the mandatory microchip for cats. 57% of the cats who arrived in Battersea last year were not microchipped, making it extremely difficult for them to find their owners. These include Bruno, a 3-year-old short-haired domestic cat, who arrived in Battersea as a stray last week. Since he is not microchipped, Battersea could not find his owner and will be looking for a new home for him in the coming weeks.

Battersea welcomes other measures outlined in the animal welfare action plan, including a crackdown on pet theft and a proposal to ban remote-controlled shock collars, which cause unnecessary suffering. The association is now eager to work with the government on the details surrounding these measures and to present the legislation required to ensure the creation of a leading environment for pets in the UK.

Source link

]]> 0
Increase in ear culture in dogs prompts plans for UK import ban – News Thu, 13 May 2021 07:00:00 +0000

Doberman splints

Photo by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

A young Doberman’s ears are hitched after cropping, a controversial procedure in which the outer floppy portion of the ear is surgically removed.

The UK is set to ban the import of dogs with cropped ears, amid an apparent upsurge in the practice spurred by pop stars and other celebrities that has prompted vets to call for more rules strict.

Britain’s ruling Conservative government announced this week that it will introduce the import ban as part of a series of measures designed to improve animal welfare, including mandatory cat microchipping and the ban electric shock training collars. The new rules will be introduced for parliamentary votes via a series of bills, the government said on Wednesday.

The move is a victory for the British Veterinary Association, a British pressure group for the profession, which joined animal welfare organization The Foal Group last year to launch a petition calling for an import ban cultured dogs. The petition garnered more than 100,000 signatures, forcing lawmakers to look into the matter.

The push for change in Britain adds to the global debate over whether to ban or at least restrict procedures that offer little or no benefit to animal health, such as cultivation of ears, tail and declawing cats.

The UK banned cultivation of ears a long time ago, but owners can import cultured dogs – a loophole the BVA fears acts as a smokescreen for illegal crops grown at home.

Ear cultivation is banned in many places, including Europe and Australasia, but is permitted in the United States. The process, also known as cosmetic otoplasty, involves cutting off part of a dog’s atria – and sometimes supporting what’s left with duct tape and splints – so the ears will straighten out. It is believed that the erect ears make the animal more intimidating.

At worst, cultures are done roughly by non-veterinarians using scalpels or scissors and without anesthetic. When performed by veterinary professionals, the process potentially exposes animals to the ordinary surgical risks of infection and complications during anesthesia.

According to the American Veterinary Medical Association, cropped dogs experience discomfort during healing, stretching, rebounding, and bandaging, which discourages the practice. Additionally, dogs use their bodies, including their ears and tails, to communicate. It is widely understood that erect ears, for example, can indicate attention, slightly flattened cuteness of the ears, and aggression from well-flattened ears. The effect of cropping the ears on dog communication does not appear to have been thoroughly researched.

Vets and charities watch influential celebrities

Dr Daniella Dos Santos sees “more and more” dogs with cropped ears in practice, mostly puppies and young adults. “I don’t tend to see older dogs with cropped ears, which fits the theory that this is an emerging trend that we are seeing,” said Dos Santos, senior vice president of BVA, at the VIN press service.

Dos Santos’ experiences in a practice in Kent, England, where she recently moved from, are supported by anecdotal evidence from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, an animal welfare charity . In February, he claimed to have seen a 236% increase in ear culture cases, from 14 in 2015 to 47 in 2019, with a total of 178 reports over the five-year period.

The rise, according to Dos Santos and others, correlates with celebrities featuring more and more cultured dogs on social media and in video clips. British stars recently named in the popular press for being associated with the practice include pop star Rita Ora and Manchester United footballer Marcus Rashford.

To what extent the practice should be regulated is a controversial issue at the international level. On a bulletin board of the Veterinary Information Network, an online community for the profession and parent of VIN News, more than a dozen veterinarians recently spoke on the subject. Several expressed a wish for the practice to be banned in the United States, while another suggested that bans would encourage owners to seek the operation from unscrupulous actors. One described cropping as an art form, if done correctly; others doubted that many older vets would teach cultivation techniques to the next generation.

Dr Victoria Bentley, who practices in Medina, New York, personally finds crops unpleasant, but opposes strict regulations. “I don’t want anyone telling me how to practice medicine,” Bentley wrote on VIN. “I prefer that this decision be made between me and the client. Let’s not settle to death.”

Public outrage over cultures appears to be more low-key in the United States, although at least one celebrity there, Scott Disick, in 2017 gained attention on social media for having his ears cut off. pit bull. Other American celebrities, such as comedian and actor Kevin Hart, proudly share photos of their cut dogs (in Hart’s case, two Doberman pinschers) with little noticeable reflection.

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals told VIN News it does not have any data indicating whether the practice of cob growing in the United States has increased, decreased, or remained stable. “Responsible breeders reject cruel practices and do not subject their dogs to permanent physical alterations that are performed solely for cosmetic purposes,” said a spokesperson for the charity.

Degenerative bans show potential for regulatory change in US

Nine US states regulate the cultivation of cobs, but none of them prohibit it, according to the AVMA. Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Pennsylvania prohibit the cultivation of ears except by a licensed veterinarian. Washington allows it when it is considered a “customary breeding practice”. A number of states have rules on stowing the tails of horses or cattle, but only two – Maryland and Pennsylvania – have restrictions on stowing the tails of dogs, according to the AVMA. New York lawmakers have proposed bills to ban ear and tail cropping in dogs for cosmetic purposes, but none have gone beyond the limit.

Lawmakers recently responded with success against another controversial surgery. In 2019, New York became the first US state to ban declawing in cats. Eleven major US cities also ban the practice, according to advocacy group Alley Cat Allies – the latest being Austin, Texas, in March.

Cat declawing, or onychectomy, is the amputation of a cat’s third phalanx, or bone, toes to stop scratching behaviors that might otherwise lead owners to abandon or euthanize the animal. The AVMA discourages declawing, which opponents of the practice say causes pain, lameness and behavior problems, but the national group and some state-based veterinary associations are stopping before advocating for prohibitions.

Last month, a bill banning declawing in California was withdrawn after it was rejected by the California Veterinary Medical Association, which called it “an inappropriate attempt to legislate on the scope of practice of veterinary medicine and interfere with clinical decision making in the context of a veterinarian. -the client-patient relationship. “

Regarding ear culture, Bentley, the practitioner from New York State, suggests that instead of targeting politicians, proponents of change in the United States could target breed registries and dog shows that still support the practice. The American Kennel Club includes cropping and tail trimming in some breed standards, such as the Doberman pinscher, saying that these are “acceptable practices that are integral to defining and maintaining character. race and / or improved health. ” The AKC adds that “appropriate veterinary care should be provided”. The Kennel Club in the UK, on ​​the other hand, does not allow dogs with cropped ears in its events.

Dos Santos, the English veterinarian, believes that ear cultivation is outside the scope of veterinary medicine as it does not concern animal health. “The reality is that this is unnecessary mutilation with no medical benefit – and rightly illegal mutilation in this country,” she said in a recent interview.

Dos Santos on Wednesday described the government’s commitment to change the rules in the UK as a “huge victory” for animal welfare. “The BVA and our members are happy to assist the government with whatever is needed to help implement these measures as soon as possible,” she said.

VIN News Service commentaries are opinion pieces presenting ideas, personal experiences and / or perspectives on topical issues by members of the veterinary community. To submit a comment for review, email

Source link

]]> 0
Animals will be officially recognized as sentient beings under UK law Thu, 13 May 2021 01:05:00 +0000

The UK is set to update its legislation to declare animals to be sentient beings capable of feeling sensations and emotions.

In a massive victory for animal activists, the ruling will apply to all animals, from pets to species abroad.

UK Environment Secretary George Eustice said in a statement: “We are a nation of animal lovers and were the first country in the world to pass animal welfare laws.

“Our animal welfare action plan will meet our clear commitment to ban the export of live animals for slaughter and fattening, to ban the breeding of primates as pets and introduce new laws to combat puppy smuggling.

“As an independent nation, we are now able to go further than ever to build on our strong record.”

Credit: PA

Foie gras could potentially be banned under the new ruling because of the treatment ducks and geese go through to produce the food, and electronic collars that train pets will get the boot.

Import rules will be changed to stop the contraband puppy trade and there will be bans on the trade in ivory and shark fins.

British authorities will have a new crackdown on illegal hare hunting and the sale and use of glue traps will be restricted, according to the Guardian.

Farmers will be pressured to change the way they raise and store live animals, as the government has chosen not to introduce strict rules on cages and crates for poultry and pigs.

Compassion in World Farming Senior Policy Director James West welcomed the measures.

“We have long called for UK legislation that recognizes animals as sentient beings and that sensitivity is duly taken into account when formulating and implementing policy,” he said.

“We are also delighted that the government has confirmed that it will legislate to ban live exports for slaughter and fattening for a long time. We have been campaigning for this for decades: it is high time to end it. this cruel and unnecessary trade. ”

The export of live animals for slaughter will also be banned in the UK under the new ruling and people may soon be unable to import hunting trophies from endangered animals.

A UK government statement said: “Now that we have left the EU, the UK has new freedoms to further strengthen animal welfare standards and strengthen its position as a global champion of animal rights.”

Source link

]]> 0
£ 500 fine for pets without a chip – Forbes Advisor UK Wed, 12 May 2021 22:00:00 +0000

Cat owners who fail to microchip their pets will be fined £ 500 under proposed new laws to tackle pet theft and black market resale.

The rules are part of a package introduced by a new government animal welfare task force. The unit is also planning to take action against puppy trafficking and the so-called “shock collars” used to discipline dogs.

A task force was also formed to focus on pet theft, which increased dramatically during the lockdown, when demand for “ pandemic pet partners ” skyrocketed.

The proposed legislation will also address animal welfare issues in agriculture, including a ban on the export of live animals for slaughter, and seek to improve wildlife protection.

The mandatory microchip, already in place for dogs, helps track lost or stolen animals that are illegally resold. More than a quarter of the UK’s 11 million cats are currently microchipped, according to charity Cats Protection, which means their owners can face fines unless they take action.

According to a Freedom of Information request filed by campaign group Pet Theft Awareness, recorded cat thefts increased 12% in 2020 from the previous year, while numbers rose 194% between 2015 and 2020.

The most targeted breeds were the Bengal, Maine Coon, and British Short Hair, which can sell in the thousands.

The microchip involves injecting a small device containing property data into the neck of an animal. The animal can be scanned for a chip and the data retrieved to establish ownership.

The procedure is inexpensive (around £ 20 to £ 30), quick and painless. Click here to find out more.

“ Safe from danger ”

Peter Laurie, Managing Director of Battersea Dogs & Cats Home, said: “Every dog ​​and cat deserves to be safe, which means fighting against these animals that are traded illegally and under bad conditions. -being, being proactive in protecting owners from the devastation of having lost or stolen their pets and doing whatever we can to bring them together. “

Some pet insurance policies require dog owners to microchip their pets or risk canceling their policies. These insurers can take the same approach with cat owners once the mandatory cat microchip takes effect.

The government task force will present a number of bills over the coming months to introduce the new rules. This includes legislation banning controversial remote control training collars that allow users to shock their dogs.

Beyond owning pets, the government will seek to ban the sale of foie gras – the liver of ducks and geese that have been force-fed. In addition, a new Animal Sensitivity Bill will be presented to Parliament tomorrow, May 13, to officially recognize animals as sentient beings.

Chris Sherwood, RSPCA CEO, said: “These announcements will make a real and lasting difference to animal welfare, so we are delighted that the government is committed to improving the lives of animals.”

Source link

]]> 0
Dogs will continue to kill if we ban electronic collars Wed, 05 May 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Imagine that your dog has been shot by a farmer. How would you feel I don’t need to imagine. A few years ago my Great Dane Kiri was shot after he escaped and started attacking sheep.

What the farmer did was right. The jaws of powerful dogs inflict horrible pain. Such attacks on livestock are a huge problem. The government estimates that 15,000 sheep die each year. Countless others are mutilated. Also think about the trauma inflicted on entire herds when dogs chase them. Tragically, this animal welfare scandal is getting even worse – this year attacks have increased by around 50%.

What can we do about this crisis? The starting point is the use of leads. But it is irresponsible to rely solely on the tracks. Sometimes powerful dogs snatch them from their owner’s hand. And dogs are extremely good at escaping – in two-thirds of attacks, the owner was not present. It is also impossible to judge the risk of our off-leash dogs encountering animals. Do you think the owner of the burrow that killed Freddie the Seal should have expected his dog to find him on a Thames footpath?

So what can responsible dog owners do to provide extra protection? Train your dog well. It sounds simple, but it’s hard to get a workout to work, especially when it comes to breaking down predatory instincts in dogs. Many activists advocate “positive only” training that uses treats to encourage good behavior. It helps with the basic “sit” and “heel” controls. But there is no evidence that it works when the red haze comes down. It is wrong to claim that the prospect of a cookie will prevent an off-leash dog from attacking.

There is, however, a training method that is recommended by vets because it has a lot of scientific backing. Hundreds of thousands of animal lovers use it, including Steve Redgrave, Andrew Lloyd Webber, and Russell Brand. I’m talking about electronic necklaces. Some electronic collars protect pets in gardens. Others make dogs fearful of attacking sheep. Simply put, when the dog associates a jump in his collar with a sheep, he avoids them.

This reaction has been observed in multiple scientific experiments: it is “the only treatment that has potential for success”, it “avoided the 13 attempted attacks on lambs” and created a “strong learning effect. Which lasted “at least a year”. In short, they work. Even when the dog escaped.

In Australia, they make dogs fearful of attacking snakes. In New Zealand, authorities insist on training electronic collars to prevent them from preying on kiwi birds. What may surprise you is that scientists find that electric collar training does no harm: it caused “no negative effects on dogs” and produced “significant increases in emotional stability in dogs. dogs”. Thus, the demonization of electronic collars by the dog whisperers of Twitter is without evidence.

The Kennel Club says it has “no direct evidence of abuse.” The RSPCA – which investigates 149,000 animal welfare cases per year – has never found evidence to prosecute for electronic collar abuse.

All of this makes one curious as to why Defra wants to ban these devices. Could this be due to the animal rights virtue reported by ministers? Of course not, Defra says. He insists the proposed ban is justified by research conducted for the department. Still, look beneath the surface and a real little scandal arises.

First, Defra officials previously told ministers that this research was “not strong enough” to warrant a ban. Second, as MP Sir John Hayes asked, why did the department commission its research from academics who had previously campaigned for Defra to ban electronic necklaces?

Given these prejudices, it is not surprising that top academics have described this research, conducted by the University of Lincoln, as “very seriously flawed.” Lincoln academics should have revealed their interest. Defra ministers should not use your money to pay researchers with a publicly stated bias for or against the topic. And ministers should not shy away from Sir John’s questions.

Is there anything more outrageous? Well yes. Because, after Defra announced plans to ban electronic collars, one of his ministers trained his own dog with one. Step forward Therese Coffey, now in the Cabinet. Obviously, she thinks Defra’s case against electronic necklaces is unfounded.

Being an animal lover requires a calm understanding of how electronic collars save the lives of countless animals. As the vets wrote, “We believe the welfare consequences of a ban on these collars would be appalling.”

The real scandal is how much misguided owners think it is better to have their dogs slaughtered rather than using the proven solution of electronic collars to prevent their dogs from attacking innocent animals.

Those of us who love dogs should demand a record of the number of healthy dogs that are dropped off because they have not been properly trained.

Source link

]]> 0
Scottish election 2021: Anas Sarwar warns Scotland cannot afford to lose more animal species Mon, 03 May 2021 06:02:35 +0000

Mr Sarwar said Scottish Labor would present a national stimulus package that protects Scottish wildlife as he criticized the SNP’s cuts to environmental bodies.

Nearly half of the species have become less abundant in the past decade, according to the figures.

Register now to our newsletter Policy

Register now to our newsletter Policy

The Labor leader said that since 2010 the SNP had cut funding to major environmental bodies, including the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) and rural and environmental science and analytical services.

Scottish Labor leader Anas Sarwar has said his party will protect conservation.

Scottish Natural Heritage, now NatureScot, has seen its budget cut by £ 33million in real terms since 2010.

While the SNP mentions wildlife in its manifesto – including a pledge to protect at least 30% of Scottish land by 2030 – Scottish Labor’s climate recovery plan includes a pledge to conduct a comprehensive review of outdated legislation Scotland, to strengthen legislation on wildlife protection and animal welfare.

Fabrice Leveque, head of policy at the charity WWF Scotland, said he was “disappointed to see a lack of commitments on agricultural reform and nature restoration” in the SNP manifesto.

Scottish Labor has pledged to completely ban fox hunting, snares and the use of electric collars. The party also called for more effective monitoring of raptor conservation and tougher penalties.

Read more

Read more

Scottish election 2021: possibility of low turnout will worry SNP, not Scottish …

As part of Scottish Labor’s climate recovery plan, the party would create a Scottish Conservation Corps to employ 10,000 people dedicated to restoring Scotland’s natural environment, tackling both jobs and crises climate in Scotland.

Scottish Labor leader Anas Sarwar said: “Scotland’s natural environment is one of the best in the world and we have a responsibility to protect and promote the wildlife that live there.

“Years of SNP cuts have weakened our environmental agencies. Too many of our species are threatened with extinction. The Greens prefer to bring us back to old arguments rather than protect Scottish wildlife. “

He added: “This election is a clear choice between a party that will unite behind the recapture of Scotland to protect our natural environment, or a continuing division over the constitution.”

The SNP has been contacted for comment.

A message from the editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We depend on your support more than ever, because the change in consumption habits induced by the coronavirus is having an impact on our advertisers.

If you haven’t already, consider supporting our trusted and verified journalism by purchasing a digital subscription.

Source link

]]> 0