Ban Shock http://banshock.org/ Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:56:14 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.3 https://banshock.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ban-shock-icon-150x150.png Ban Shock http://banshock.org/ 32 32 Director of Philanthropy, Animal Welfare Industry Employment with Arizona Animal Welfare League & SPCA https://banshock.org/director-of-philanthropy-animal-welfare-industry-employment-with-arizona-animal-welfare-league-spca/ Mon, 14 Nov 2022 18:44:48 +0000 https://banshock.org/director-of-philanthropy-animal-welfare-industry-employment-with-arizona-animal-welfare-league-spca/

AAWL Philanthropy Director Career Opportunity

  • Do you have experience building a major gifts program from scratch and asking for 5, 6 and 7 figure donations?
  • Do you thrive on cultivating and soliciting donors and inspiring them to make an impact through their own philanthropy?
  • Are you passionate about rethinking the role of animal shelters to expand community support for affordable and accessible veterinary care and keeping animals in their homes?
  • If you answered “yes” to these questions, we would love for you to join the Arizona Animal Welfare League in Phoenix, Arizona as Director of Philanthropy!

AAWL – Who are we?

Founded in 1971, the Arizona Animal Welfare League is the largest and oldest no-kill shelter in the state of Arizona. We started as a small sanctuary for homeless animals and have grown over the past 51 years to become a statewide animal welfare organization offering a full range of community services ranging from adoptions and behavioral support to low-cost veterinary services.

With a combined annual budget of approximately $5.8 million, AAWL is a private shelter (without any government contracts) dedicated to providing excellent care, protection, and loving compassion for the lives of the animals in our lives. entrusted. To achieve our mission, we operate adoption, behavioral, foster, medical and volunteer programs. Our staff includes 53 full-time employees and 27 part-time employees. We are proud to leverage the time and talents of volunteers (over 450 volunteers and over 250 foster families) who are committed to assisting with all aspects of shelter operations.

Our long-term organizational goal is to mobilize essential resources to generate transformational giving in support of AAWL’s strategic goals. As part of our five-year strategic plan, AAWL is focused on creating a culturally competent community veterinary medicine program that provides affordable and accessible veterinary care to underserved pet owners living in Central City Phoenix, a vibrant community and multicultural. near downtown Phoenix. We also plan to expand our shelter response efforts to help pet owners keep their animals at home and out of the shelter system. This ambitious effort presents an exciting opportunity for an experienced fundraising professional to help lead these efforts to dramatically increase investments in AAWL to have an even greater impact on the lives of animals and people who care. occupy it. To learn more about AAWL’s work and our future plans, visit: https://aawl.org/communityfund.

Job Overview

The Director of Philanthropy is a member of the management team and reports directly to the President and CEO. The Director of Philanthropy will lead a three-person team including a Donor Relations Manager, Development Coordinator, and Contractual Grants Writer. This is a full-time exempt position based in Phoenix.

AAWL’s budgeted fundraising goal for fiscal year 2022 ending December 31, 2022 is $2.4 million, with the vast majority of that revenue (38%) coming from individual donations. Our goal is to hire a Director of Philanthropy who can lead efforts to significantly increase these annual giving over the next five years.

Working closely with the President/CEO, the Director of Philanthropy is primarily responsible for planning, overseeing, and executing AAWL’s Major Gifts program (focused on donors giving to more than 10,000 levels) and developing complementary fundraising and donor retention plans for each donor or prospect.

In addition, the Director of Philanthropy will oversee these other revenue-generating efforts: corporate philanthropy, planned giving, workplace giving, direct mail appeals and events. Finally, the Director of Philanthropy will work closely with a Grant Writer to edit grant proposals that support strategic initiatives and will work collaboratively with program staff in all departments to track grant deliverables and reporting. progress on targets in interim and final grant reports.


Responsibilities

  • Develop, lead and evaluate a comprehensive annual work plan focused on major gifts and including fundraising goals and targets for meetings with donors capable of making annual gifts of $10,000 and above.
  • Work with the President/CEO to solicit five-, six-, and seven-figure annual and planned giving through one-on-one face-to-face meetings with donors and prospects.
  • Manage a portfolio of approximately 240 donors/prospects between CEO and DP.
  • Coach, support and develop a Donor Relations Manager and Development Coordinator to execute on annual fundraising goals.
  • Oversee corporate solicitation efforts and fundraising efforts for events, including developing realistic goals, assisting with solicitations as needed to ensure event success and corporate partnerships.
  • Oversee planned giving efforts, including identifying planned giving prospects and leading discussions with donors on how to leave a legacy for AAWL.
  • Lead the foundation’s grantmaking efforts, including working with the Grant Contract Writer to edit grant applications and prepare grant reports and other communications with funders based on donor interests and the organization. progress of the program.
  • Oversee departmental administrative systems related to fundraising goals, including data management, donation tracking, processes and procedures, reporting, donation processing/recognition. Develop evaluation reports for monitoring and managing the program towards annual objectives.
  • Work with the Director of Marketing and Communications to identify content for quarterly mail calls and year-end impact reports, including assisting with changes and tracking progress toward goals.
  • Manage and write quarterly communications to donors about AAWL’s mission, activities and successes in a compelling, inspirational and motivational manner.
  • Maintain a working knowledge of animal welfare issues and AAWL priorities.

QUALIFICATIONS

  • Demonstrated interest in animal welfare issues and commitment to AAWL’s mission.
  • Five years of related development experience, with progressive accountability and proven track record in soliciting, closing and managing major gifts over $10,000 for annual/multi-year campaigns, and experience in converting new donors to major donors.
  • Minimum of three (3) years of supervisory experience, including the ability to motivate, lead, set goals and foster an environment of collaboration, innovation, humility and professional growth.
  • Experience in developing and implementing a comprehensive, strategic and goal-oriented development plan.
  • Experience managing a planned giving program.
  • Demonstrated commitment to working cooperatively and respectfully to resolve conflicts.
  • Strong work ethic and ability to interact effectively with staff, volunteers and community members from diverse geographic and socio-economic backgrounds.
  • Proficiency in office automation (including Word, Excel, Outlook, PowerPoint) and donor databases. Experience with Razor’s Edge preferred.
  • Excellent verbal and written communication skills with a wide range of audiences.

TERMS

Requires periodic sitting at a computer station with prolonged standing and walking. Use of personal computer, telephone and general office equipment. Must be comfortable handling dogs and cats on a daily basis on an ongoing basis. Will be exposed to disinfectant solutions and prone to bites and scratches when handling animals with questionable temperaments. Requires normal range of hearing and sight to communicate with animals, public, volunteers and staff. Also requires flexibility to easily adapt to a fast-paced environment and the ability to work weekends and holidays.

BENEFITS AND COMPENSATION

AAWL offers compensation commensurate with experience and competitive with nonprofit and animal welfare salaries. The starting salary for this position is $71,700. Benefits include 100% employer-paid medical insurance, employer-paid premiums for life insurance, generous paid vacation/sick leave, 12 paid vacations per year, and an employee assistance program. (EAP) which includes counseling visits, in-person/virtual capacity visits, personal coaching sessions and wellness app.

TO APPLY FOR THIS POSITION:

Please submit a cover letter, resume, three professional references (including their email address, phone, and relationship), and writing sample to: anavidad@aawl.org. Please mention “Director of Philanthropy” in your email. No phone calls or appointments. Please indicate where you found this review in your cover letter.

]]>
Class action claims ‘seriously dangerous’ PetSafe shock collars are falsely advertised as safe and effective https://banshock.org/class-action-claims-seriously-dangerous-petsafe-shock-collars-are-falsely-advertised-as-safe-and-effective/ Thu, 27 Oct 2022 20:48:24 +0000 https://banshock.org/class-action-claims-seriously-dangerous-petsafe-shock-collars-are-falsely-advertised-as-safe-and-effective/

A proposed class action lawsuit alleges that Radio Systems Corporation falsely advertised its PetSafe shock collars as “safe” and “harmless”, given that the products were found to be “seriously hazardous” to the physical and psychological well-being of pets. company.

According to the 36-page case, the defendant is representing its PetSafe shock collars, which are designed to deliver an electric shock to an animal’s neck to discourage unwanted behavior, such as barking or crossing a boundary, recommended as a safe and effective training tool. by veterinarians and professional dog trainers. To allay owners’ fears of shocking their pets, the company uses euphemisms such as “static correction”, “surprise”, “tickling” and “stimulation” to describe what, in reality, is a painful electric shock, indicates the combination.

The lawsuit alleges that Radio Systems knew about and did not disclose to pet owners that “[h]Hundreds of documented cases” have shown that using shock collars like PetSafe products can cause serious injuries, including skin breakdown, bruising, inflammation, burns, and infection.

Do you want to stay informed about the class actions that interest you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.

Additionally, the case argues that “an overwhelming body of scientific research” has confirmed that using shock collars as a training method can cause psychological stress, anxiety, confusion, and depression. in pets, and even lead to gastrointestinal problems and “irreversible changes”. in an animal’s heart rate and respiration. For instance, a study concluded that receiving shocks is “a painful experience” for dogs and may teach them that the presence of their owner, or their commands, is associated with painful shocks, “even outside of the normal training context”, relay the combination.

Additionally, the lawsuit claims that another “well-documented” negative effect of shock collars is increased aggression and behavioral problems in dogs in response to shock. According to the lawsuit, “a strong body of scientific literature” shows that the use of electric shock collars is “directly relatedto heightened aggression and that shock-induced aggression is “generally intense and vicious” without the usual warning signs that dogs typically display in response to outside events. As the case may be, training an animal using a shock collar has been shown to be less effective and more dangerous than positive reinforcement training.

The lawsuit goes on to say that although Radio Systems states that its PetSafe collars are recommended by veterinarians and dog training experts, “[n]nothing could be further from the truth. According to the case, the use of shock collars has been “uniformly condemned” by professional canine behaviorists, experts, trainers and veterinarians, and animal rights groups have denounced the products as being ineffective and “cruel devices.”

According to the lawsuit, consumers would not have purchased the PetSafe shock collars if Radio Systems had warned them of the associated safety risks and the “cruelty behind the pet being painfully electrocuted.”

“Nowhere does the defendant disclose the truth – that Shock Collar products are dangerous products that should not be used on pets as a method of training, confining or punishing a pet. Instead of properly warning consumers, defendant continues to falsely claim that Shock Collar products are “safe” and “harmless.”

The plaintiff in the case is a California consumer who says he noticed “a sticky residue and foul odor” around his dog’s neck shortly after purchasing and using a PetSafe shock collar. When the plaintiff removed the collar, according to the case, he saw that “a piece of fur was missing” from his dog’s neck, and a veterinarian later “identified holes in his dog’s neck that coincided with the placement of the inserts in the shock collar. Product”, relays the costume. The complainant says he stopped using PetSafe products after discovering their “harmful effects”.

The lawsuit appears to represent anyone who purchased one or more PetSafe shock collar products in California.

Warning: The complaint below contains a graphic image of a pet injury.

Get class action news delivered to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.

]]>
PetSafe shock collars falsely advertised as ‘harmless’, class action claims https://banshock.org/petsafe-shock-collars-falsely-advertised-as-harmless-class-action-claims/ Wed, 26 Oct 2022 20:54:16 +0000 https://banshock.org/petsafe-shock-collars-falsely-advertised-as-harmless-class-action-claims/
(Photo credit: Ursa Major/Shutterstock)

PetSafe Shock Collar Lawsuit Overview:

  • Who: A dog owner is suing Radio Systems, the maker of PetSafe shock collars.
  • Why: The plaintiff claims that the company falsely markets the collars as safe and harmless to use on animals, when in fact they are harmful to pets.
  • Where: The PetSafe shock collar lawsuit was filed in federal court in California.

Radio Systems markets its PetSafe shock collars as safe and harmless, even though they actually harm pets physically and psychologically, according to a new class action lawsuit.

Plaintiff Steven Hernandez filed the class action lawsuit against Radio Systems Corporation on October 21 in federal court in California, alleging violations of state and federal consumer laws.

According to the lawsuit, Radio Systems manufactures PetSafe shock collars and markets them as “safe” and “harmless.” Shock collars deliver electric shocks to animals via a collar worn around the neck.

“In fact, the use of electric shocks is seriously dangerous to the physical and psychological well-being of pets,” the lawsuit states.

In Hernandez’s case, he says he used the collar on his dog until he noticed a sticky residue and a foul odor coming from his dog’s neck.

“He removed his dog’s shock collar and saw that a piece of fur was missing from his dog’s neck,” the lawsuit states. “His vet identified holes in his dog’s neck that coincided with the placement of the inserts in the Shock Collar product.”

Radio Systems used deceptive language to conceal reality of shock collars, lawsuit alleges

To disguise the true nature of shock collars, Radio Systems uses euphemisms to describe what it feels like to an animal electrocuted by a pet shock collar, the lawsuit says.

Among the most popular terms he uses to mistakenly describe a painful electric shock are “static correction”, “surprise”, “tickling” and “stimulation”, he says.

On the product’s packaging and website, Radio Systems prominently displays false claims that the collars have been scientifically proven to be safe and are recommended by veterinarians and professional dog trainers, the lawsuit says.

Instead, there are hundreds of documented cases that reveal the use of shock collars can cause serious injuries to pets, including skin breaks, bruises, inflammation, burns and infections, says the trial.

Shock collars also lead to psychological stress, anxiety and depression caused by the repeated painful shocks, the lawsuit states.

Plaintiff seeks to represent anyone who purchased a necklace in California.

He is suing under California consumer and business laws and seeking class action certification, an order preventing Radio Systems from labeling the products as safe, financial restitution, fees, costs, and a jury trial.

In September, Bayer was hit with a class action alleging that he continues to market his Flea and tick collars Seresto are safe for pets even after tens of thousands of injuries and over a thousand deaths.

Do you have a PetSafe shock collar? Let us know what you think of these claims in the comments!

Plaintiff is represented by Amber L. Schubert, Robert C. Schubert and Willem F. Jonckheer of Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP.

The Radio Systems Class Action is Steven Hernandez v. Radio Systems CorporationCase #5: 22-cv-01861 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of the Eastern Division of California.



Learn more about class actions and class action settlements:

We tell you about the money you can claim EVERY WEEK! Subscribe to our free newsletter.

]]>
PETA Calls on Feds to Investigate Cornell’s Animal Welfare Practices https://banshock.org/peta-calls-on-feds-to-investigate-cornells-animal-welfare-practices/ Mon, 24 Oct 2022 07:00:00 +0000 https://banshock.org/peta-calls-on-feds-to-investigate-cornells-animal-welfare-practices/

ITHACA, NY—The well-known animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has sent letters to Cornell University and the United States Department of Agriculture demanding that the treatment of animals by the school is investigated.

PETA’s request, to the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, addresses various claims made at Cornell between April 2018 and earlier this year. The organization’s claims are based on a communication between the school’s life sciences department and the National Institute of Health, in which the school self-reports violations of laboratory animal protocol, normally during any testing, and NIH officials assess the school’s response and submit a remedial plan. .

PETA’s letters are addressed to Dr. Robert M. Gibbens of the USDA Animal Welfare Operations Division and Cornell University President Dr. Martha Pollack. The letter to Pollack calls on him to more severely punish those at the school who have committed violations of animal welfare protocols during care or lab procedures.

There are 17 incidents documented during the period in question, some of which had already been flagged and flagged by PETA. The most recent incident took place on April 29, 2022, when a sheep died from an improperly administered artery graft. most central to PETA’s complaint. The procedure was carried out on five sheep – on four of the sheep it was successful, but the final transplant in the sheep failed because the graft was able to heal for less time than the others, and although medical responses were attempted, they also failed and the animal was euthanized after two failed surgeries.

“We believe that the treatment of sheep at Cornell described in the incidents
detailed below does not meet the standards of veterinary care of the
[Animal Welfare Regulations]reads the letter to the USDA.

Two other incidents date back to March 2022: seven mice that were to be euthanized were kept in an unapproved place and were not given enough water and food before being euthanized; and application of anesthesia to sheep that did not follow approved procedures, although the report noted that “no breakthrough pain was observed.” These incidents are not specifically included in PETA’s request for investigation.

In each incident, communication from the NIH Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare shows that officials were satisfied with the explanation provided by Cornell and agreed with the corrective plans suggested by Cornell.

Cornell officials did not respond to a request for comment.

The demands mark another salvo against the school by PETA, which has criticized Cornell’s vet and adjacent practices for years. notably in the spring of 2020 when the organization raised similar allegations on Cornell’s animal welfare policies, even citing some of the same incidents cited in the new letters, sent Oct. 20.

At that time, Cornell Vice President Joel Malina said the school always “demanded[d] any investigator or instructor wishing to use animals to perform this work in accordance with all laws, regulations and policies governing the care and use of animals.

]]>
Eat less meat urges animal welfare organizations https://banshock.org/eat-less-meat-urges-animal-welfare-organizations/ Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:00:00 +0000 https://banshock.org/eat-less-meat-urges-animal-welfare-organizations/

World Animal Protection and animal welfare organizations are urging consumers to eat less meat and save the planet.

Speaking in Nairobi at the end of the two-day African Protein Summit, the group noted that the growing demand for meat has led to the growth of factory animal farms which are contributing to a hot, hotter and unpredictable climate. . By eating less meat, and through higher welfare production systems and alternative proteins, there will be less greenhouse gas emissions, leading to fewer effects of climate change.

The summit also urges African governments to temporarily ban factory farming systems that endanger animals and contribute to climate change.

“The soaring demand for meat has caused billions of animals to be mutilated and stressed and confined in cramped, sterile cages or enclosures for their entire lives. Animals cruelly packaged in such shades are often extremely stressed, leaving them makes them prone to infections with bacteria or parasites that can cause foodborne illness in humans, such as salmonella,” says Dr. Victor Yamo, Agricultural Campaigns Manager at World Animal Protection.

“We urge African governments to recognize the interconnectedness between public health and the planetary impacts of industrialized agricultural systems and commit to ending support for these systems. Commitment in the form of a moratorium on industrial animal production systems should be part of national climate action plans (known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)) in recognition of the contribution of these systems to climate impacts. African governments must also develop and implement national One Health, One Welfare action plans that recognize the health impacts of industrialized livestock and limit its growth.” He continued.

“We recognize that change will be slow but sure and that systemic changes are needed to deliver the greatest health gains to our population. Some of these include redirecting subsidies from industrial agriculture towards humane and sustainable practices, improving the accessibility of plant-based foods and providing transition support for farmers who do not want to engage more in industrial agriculture. Says Dr. Victor Yamo.

]]>
The Animal Welfare Association is teaming up with Subaru for the automaker’s annual “Make a Dog’s Day” event in Camden on October 19 https://banshock.org/the-animal-welfare-association-is-teaming-up-with-subaru-for-the-automakers-annual-make-a-dogs-day-event-in-camden-on-october-19/ Tue, 18 Oct 2022 07:00:00 +0000 https://banshock.org/the-animal-welfare-association-is-teaming-up-with-subaru-for-the-automakers-annual-make-a-dogs-day-event-in-camden-on-october-19/

VOORHEES, NJ/ACCESSWIRE/October 18, 2022/ Animal Welfare Association (AWA), the oldest and largest low-cost spaying clinic, adoption center and no-kill animal shelter in South Jersey, in partnership with Subaru of America, Inc., will host its annual Camden “Make A Dog’s Day” event on Wednesday 19th Octobere 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. at Von Neida Park, 1084 North 29e Street, in Camden, NJ The event, dedicated to making all dogs feel loved and cared for, especially dogs with special needs, is open to the public and attendees (and their pets) can enjoy dog-themed games including “‘Bark’sketball”, food trucks, “Ask the Trainer” sessions, plus a free gift of pet food, AWA’s Vets on wheels free vaccination clinic (rabies and distemper) and free microchip for dogs and cats.

“We are very pleased to partner with Subaru of America for this event for the Camden area community,” said new AWA Executive Director Laura Houston. “It’s a fun way to interact with residents while providing free activities, care, and necessities for their canine family members.”

“Subaru of America is thrilled to once again host our Make A Dog’s Day celebration in Camden this year in partnership with the Animal Welfare Association,” said Shira Haaz, Corporate Responsibility Manager, Subaru of America, Inc. program, AWA has helped so many of Camden’s four-legged family members get needed healthcare each month, and we’re thrilled to celebrate these four-legged friends with a day of celebration!”

It is suggested that participants arrive early. Children participating must be accompanied by a responsible adult and all dogs to have to be on a non-retractable leash.

To learn more about adoptable animals, AWA programs and events, visit awanj.org.

Subaru has a long history of supporting pets in need and Subaru Loves Pets™ helped support the adoption of nearly 60,000 animals by local animal welfare organizations. National Make A Dog’s Day October 22 is a Subaru holiday that invites dog lovers everywhere to go the extra mile for their pup. To celebrate, Subaru is inviting dog owners to do something special for their furry friends and share on social media using #MakeADogsDay. For those who don’t yet have pets, Subaru invites Americans to consider adopting a shelter animal or “Underdog.”

To learn more about the Subaru Love Pets initiative, please visit www.subaru.com/pets and follow #SubaruLovesPets and #MakeADogsDay.

About AWA:

Animal Welfare Association (AWA), a private non-profit 501(c)3 animal welfare organization, operates the oldest and largest low-cost spaying clinic, adoption center and no-kill animal shelter in southern Jersey. Through a variety of innovative programs, including adoptions, veterinary services, pet therapy, trap-neuter-return, and humane education, it strives to ensure that animal companionship is accessible to everyone. No animals are euthanized due to space, length of stay, or treatable/manageable conditions.

About Subaru of America, Inc.

Subaru of America, Inc. (SOA) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Subaru Corporation from Japan. Based in a landfill-free office in Camden, NJ, the company markets and distributes Subaru vehicles, parts and accessories through a network of more than 630 retailers across the United States. All Subaru products are manufactured in landfill-free factories and Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. is the only automobile manufacturing plant in the United States to be designated a Backyard Wildlife Habitat by the National Wildlife Federation. SOA is guided by the Subaru Promise of Love, which is the company’s vision to show love and respect to everyone, and to support its communities and customers nationwide. Over the past 20 years, SOA and the SOA Foundation have donated more than $270 million to causes close to the Subaru family’s hearts, and its employees have logged nearly 78,000 volunteer hours. As a company, Subaru believes in doing our part to have a positive impact in the world, because it’s the right thing to do.

For more information, visit media.subaru.com. follow us on Facebook, Twitterand instagram.

Media contacts:
lauren houston
A.W.A.
856-845-9633 – Cellular
[email protected]
www.awanj.org

Diana Anton
Subaru of America
856-488-5093
[email protected]
www.subaru.com

Discover additional media content and other ESG stories from Subaru of America at 3blmedia.com.

Contact information:
Spokesperson: Subaru of America
Website: http://www.subaru.com/company/index.html
E-mail: [email protected]

THE SOURCE: Subaru of America

]]>
A Dog’s Journey Connects the Year’s Biggest Animal Welfare Cases https://banshock.org/a-dogs-journey-connects-the-years-biggest-animal-welfare-cases/ Thu, 13 Oct 2022 07:00:00 +0000 https://banshock.org/a-dogs-journey-connects-the-years-biggest-animal-welfare-cases/

LAS VEGAS (KTNV) – With a case of massive cruelty in Nye County and a burgeoning crisis at our local shelter, animal welfare has been in the spotlight in much of our media coverage over the past few years. months as the two parallel stories unfolded in our community.

Now these stories are converging.

“I’ve worked so hard on these two cases this year,” animal advocate Gina Greisen said.

His group, Nevada Voters for Animals, took the Nye County case to 13 inquests this spring, 10 weeks after a litter of puppies were born on a dusty, desolate property in the Amargosa Valley… place where several months later the caretaker Oksana Higgins reportedly arrested and charged with animal cruelty crime involving nearly 300 dogs.

Greisen’s group had been following the operation of the Est Alfa kennel, owned by Higgins’ ex-husband, Vasili Platunov, who also faces animal cruelty charges.

Nye County authorities call Platunov an illegal breeder and hoarder of security dogs, including Russian Caucasian Shepherds and Armenian Gampers.

“We had a visit from Oksana and when we were done she started telling us the dogs they were ready to spay and spay and some of the dogs they were ready to rescue,” Greisen said, remembering his visit to Amargosa. in April.

As 13 surveys reported for the first timePlatunov returned about 30 injured and severely malnourished dogs at the Spring to Desert Haven Animal Society in Pahrump.

Higgins allowed Nevada Voters for Animals to take two puppies.

“They had been starved, so they had special needs and behavioral issues, even at that young age,” Greisen said.

She named one of the puppies Cherry Cola, who was food-aggressive at just 10 weeks old.

“And as we know, there were a lot of hungry, there were a lot of puppies that died, there were a lot that died of disease and parvo and such, so I can’t imagine what, in his 10 weeks of life before I had her, which she had already been through.”

This would only be the beginning of Cherry Cola’s problems.

“Knowing what she’s been through before, and then knowing that she was all alone, scared, in the middle of the desert, and someone had done this to her…It’s devastating,” said Lori Heeren, director executive of the Nevada Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (NSPCA).

“And we brought in Cherry Cola, who is an Armenian Gamper, when she was just a few months old, and she was unfortunately fired several times. This last time was devastating for us.”

The pup went through four families in five months.

Heeren says the last dumped her in the desert near Apex and left town.

The good Samaritans who spotted the dog in a mud puddle spent hours tricking him into trusting them so they could catch him.

When Cherry Cola was discovered in the desert, she was taken to The Animal Foundation.

When the NSPCA discovered her whereabouts, they tried to retrieve her, but were told they would have to wait a few days. At the time, the shelter was experiencing an epidemic.

Now that she is back at the NSPCA, she is being kept in medical isolation.

Cherry Cola was found in the desert on Sunday, October 2.

Heeren says: “We contacted them on Monday October 3rd to see if we could get Cherry Cola straight away and were told there were a few sick dogs so I asked again if we could just get her back. , we have a vet team on site, an isolation ward, we were really worried because she was so scared and traumatized and we wanted to be able to help her as soon as possible and we got no response . on the nature of the outbreak, and we haven’t heard back.”

No one from The Animal Foundation would go on camera, but they provided emails showing they responded to the NSPCA on October 4, saying that in addition to the illness at the shelter, they were also working to contact the linked owner at the Cherry Cola chip. The email does not give any details about the nature of the outbreak.

The shelter’s marketing manager says he “immediately notified anyone who left the facility with a dog that likely had contact with the sick dog, and shelter dogs that had been exposed to the sick dog were placed in quarantine.” .

Greisen did a Facebook Live video on Monday, October 3 from outside The Animal Foundation.

“And within a very short period of time after being evicted from the property, they released an update,” Greisen said.

In The Animal Foundation’s Facebook post from the night of October 3, they said they had suspended dog adoptions due to “respiratory illness”.

It wasn’t until the next day that they updated the post with details, admitting they had had details of the highly contagious and life-threatening illnesses the previous week.

Darcy Spears: “They didn’t share anything with you?”

Lori Heeren: “No, and I specifically asked about the nature of the outbreak. We found out about it on social media. That’s how our staff found out about it.”

The Animal Foundation said its veterinary team had “made decisions based on diagnostic test results to avoid misinformation and confusion among the public”, adding: “We have been proactive in disseminating this information once results of those tests were received. Those directly affected were notified immediately, and our team worked to issue a detailed statement to the public.”

“We’re one of The Animal Foundation’s biggest transfer partners and nobody told us that,” Heeren said.

The hatching of Canine pneumovirus and strep zoo forced The Animal Foundation not to let any dogs in or out of the municipal shelter that serves the City of Las Vegas, Clark County and the City of North Las Vegas.

“This is an unprecedented crisis,” Greisen said. “We’ve never seen a time when they closed the doors of Animal Control.”

Clark County Animal Control does not currently respond to calls about stray dogs, instead trying to mitigate situations on the ground and only bringing injured or aggressive dogs to the shelter.

The City of Las Vegas says it works with residents on a case-by-case basis, enlisting the help of community veterinarians to treat seriously injured animals.

North Las Vegas, the smaller jurisdiction, says The Animal Foundation has cleared space to receive their confiscated, sick and injured animals.

As for Cherry Cola, she now awaits what’s next… A fifth placement where hopefully she will finally receive the training and care she needs to stay in a forever home.

Wednesday, The Animal Foundation released this update on the developing outbreak.

]]>
German animal welfare label risks distorting EU market, critics say – EURACTIV.com https://banshock.org/german-animal-welfare-label-risks-distorting-eu-market-critics-say-euractiv-com/ Thu, 13 Oct 2022 07:00:00 +0000 https://banshock.org/german-animal-welfare-label-risks-distorting-eu-market-critics-say-euractiv-com/

Germany’s cabinet on Wednesday (October 12th) approved Agriculture Minister Cem Özdemir’s bill for a mandatory animal welfare label, but the opposition and farming associations are warning of inconsistencies within the single market in the EU.

Read the original German story here.

In a public statement after the cabinet meeting, Germany’s Green Agriculture Minister hailed the deal as an “important step towards sustainable farming”, saying that with the new label for animal products, consumers would soon have “a real and reliable choice for more animal welfare.”

Özdemir first introduced the bill key points in June, which includes a labeling obligation which will initially apply only to unprocessed pork, then gradually extend to all animal products.

If passed, the new rules would require products to disclose under what conditions the animals were raised to produce the product.

The labels would then indicate one of five levels, from indoor farming with no access to the outdoors to free-range farming, with organic production being a separate category.

Possible distortion of the EU market

However, the new mandatory livestock labeling will only be mandatory for products farmed in Germany, with labeling of imports from other EU countries remaining voluntary, at least for now.

Here, opposition parties and farmers see a risk of market distortion.

For example, products from factory farms in other EU countries could end up on the shelves of German supermarkets without any label, while an equivalent product from German production would be obliged to carry a label indicating the one of the lowest levels of animal welfare.

In a movement Introduced at the end of September, the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag demanded that the animal welfare label also apply to food from other EU member states and third countries “to ensure a level playing field” and “strengthen regional production”.

“This livestock labeling has obvious weaknesses and shortcomings which not only do not achieve the intended effect, but in some cases even thwart it,” added Joachim Rukwied, chairman of the German Farmers’ Association in a statement. communicated.

The farmers’ association also pointed out that sow rearing – the raising of pregnant and lactating mothers and their piglets – remains excluded from the bill for the time being.

“This means that piglets castrated without anesthesia can continue to be imported from abroad into the domestic market and would still receive the animal welfare label,” Rukwied warned.

Brussels should present the original labeling

To counter market disadvantages, the Farmers’ Association has long called for the new label to be combined with the introduction of mandatory origin labeling of animal products in order to make more transparent the country in which the animals were students.

Like the animal welfare label, the label of origin also features in the coalition agreement between the ruling Social Democrats, the Greens and the liberal FDP.

However, the Ministry of Agriculture is instead pursuing the approach of pushing for the introduction of an EU-wide label of origin in Brussels.

A national approach would be both impractical due to cross-border supply chains and legally difficult in a common EU market, the ministry’s state secretary, Silvia Bender, told a briefing. round table earlier this year.

The European Court of Justice ruled at the end of 2020 that mandatory national origin labeling measures are only allowed if justified, for example, to protect public health or to prevent food fraud.

At the end of the year, the European Commission intends to present a draft law on mandatory labeling of EU-wide food packaging, which could include an extension of the mandatory labeling of products .

Clarification in the Bundestag

Despite concerns, the Farmers Association welcomed the fact that there will soon be a binding animal welfare label in Germany.

The Organic Food Industry Federation BÖLW also welcomed the cabinet’s decision, saying it was a “good day for consumers” and stressed that this step was also “important for farmers”.

The association particularly welcomed the fact that meat from organic farming is labeled in a separate category.

Animal rights activists, meanwhile, have warned that the bill still needs to be tightened up.

In a statement, Anne Hamester, representative of the capital of PROVIEH, called on the two chambers of parliament, the Bundesrat and the Bundestag, to “pronounce in favor of a restructuring of the five levels applied to animal husbandry”.

She also called for tightening the criteria that farmers must meet to achieve the highest levels of farming.

Necessary follow-up steps, such as expanding to other product groups, should be launched quickly, she added.

Meanwhile, animal welfare organization Vier Pfoten said the bill ‘fails in its central task of providing transparent information on the keeping of animals’ because it considers the naming of different forms of animal husbandry to be partly misleading.

[Edited by Nathalie Weatherald]

]]>
Second Annual Animal Welfare Scorecard in Canada Reveals Canadian Food Industry’s Progress and Problems https://banshock.org/second-annual-animal-welfare-scorecard-in-canada-reveals-canadian-food-industrys-progress-and-problems/ Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:00:00 +0000 https://banshock.org/second-annual-animal-welfare-scorecard-in-canada-reveals-canadian-food-industrys-progress-and-problems/


More than 50 top restaurants, retailers and brands ranked on corporate social responsibility metrics in new report from Mercy For Animals

TORONTO, October 12, 2022 /CNW/ — The second annual edition Animal Welfare Scorecard in Canada, released today by Mercy For Animals, ranks 55 well-known brands on their animal welfare policies and performance, and reveals a food industry lagging behind other countries on key animal care issues. ‘breeding.

Loblaws, Tim Hortons, Sobeys and Starbucks are among the household names rated and ranked in the 2022 Canadian Animal Welfare Scorecard. Companies received points for having public policies in place to transition to cage-free eggs, crate-free pork and Better Chicken Commitment standards and for reporting implementation progress toward each of these goals.

Here are the highlights from the 2022 Canadian Animal Welfare Scorecard:

  • Repeated top performers Chipotle and Whole Foods were joined at gold level by Panago and Unilever, among others.
  • Dominoes Pizza, by Mary Brownand Moxies ranked in the lower tier, each receiving zero out of a possible 300 points.
  • Metro recorded one of the biggest improvements over last year’s scorecard by becoming the first major Canadian retailer to be fully transparent on the phase-out of hog gestation crates and cruel treatment methods for chickens.
  • Tim Hortonsthe nation’s most profitable restaurant chain, has publicly announced no progress on its animal welfare commitments for the second year in a row.

Despite significant progress reported by major retailers, restaurants and consumer packaged goods brands, the Canadian Animal Welfare Dashboard 2022 also reveals troubling trends in animal welfare. from Canada animal agriculture industries.

“Having leading companies show their progress is a good sign that they are listening to concerned Canadians who are increasingly concerned about transparency,” said PJ Nyman, Senior Corporate Relations Specialist at Mercy For Animals. “The report is a valuable accountability tool for Canadians to understand which companies are publicly prioritizing improving animal welfare, but there is still a lot of work to be done. This country is falling behind on crucial animal welfare issues.

The percentage of laying hens in Canada cruelly locked up in cages is higher than in United Statesthe European Union and UK. And although more than 50 retailers in those same regions have published animal welfare policies aligned with the Better Chicken Commitment standards, to date, no Canadian retailer has worked successfully with a Canadian chicken producer to make same.

“With the oversight of animal welfare in this country concentrated in the hands of industry groups and the taxpayer-funded National Farm Animal Care Council made up of those same groups, Canada is falling behind,” Nyman said. “This is the case of the fox guarding the chicken coop. The industry must catch up to meet the expectations of Canadians and allow companies to accelerate progress in animal welfare. »

For more information or to schedule an interview with PJ Nyman, contact Jamie Evan Bichelman at [email protected]. Download the full ranking and report at CanadaScorecard.ca.

mercy for animals is an international non-profit organization working to end industrial animal agriculture by building a just and sustainable food system. active in Brazil, Canada, India, Mexicoand United States, the organization has conducted more than 100 investigations into factory farms and slaughterhouses, spurred more than 300 food companies to adopt animal welfare policies, and helped pass landmark legislation banning animal cages. breeding. Join us on MercyForAnimals.org.

SOURCE Mercy for Animals

For further information: Jamie Evan Bichelman, (617) 932-7979, [email protected]

]]>
U.S. Supreme Court assesses impact of California animal welfare law on industry and retail prices https://banshock.org/u-s-supreme-court-assesses-impact-of-california-animal-welfare-law-on-industry-and-retail-prices/ Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:00:00 +0000 https://banshock.org/u-s-supreme-court-assesses-impact-of-california-animal-welfare-law-on-industry-and-retail-prices/

The impact of California’s Animal Welfare Act Proposition 12 was hotly debated on Tuesday as the U.S. Supreme Court heard claims by lawyers representing the $26 billion pork industry that which it would cause damage to interstate commerce and pork producers.

In pleadings which lasted more than two hours, Timothy Bishop, an attorney representing the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) and the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) said the California law overstepped its bounds by imposing regulations on other states on how they raise their animals.

California, the most populous state in the country, imports over 99% pork he sells. The regulation approved by voters in 2018 prohibited the sale of pork in the state from breeding pigs – as well as veal from calves and eggs from hens – if the animals were confined to areas that did not meet the requirements. specific minimum space requirements.

“No other state requires its farmers to house pigs like California does, and very few farmers do,” Bishop said.

Judge Neil Gorsuch questioned whether the claims of the NPPC and AFBF would be better served by Congress regulating how state laws apply to interstate commerce. He asked Bishop how his argument that harm would be done to interstate competition or pork sales when several large meat companies agreed to comply with Proposition 12 standards.

“We have other pork producers who say they’re perfectly happy to fill the void that your companies don’t want to fill,” Gorsuch said. “We also have one of your own members testifying that prices won’t go up for consumers outside of California because they won’t stand it.”

Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler of the Justice Department, arguing on behalf of farm groups, said the law could have far-reaching implications outside of pork production by allowing state laws to dictate national trade.

“Proposition 12 imposes a trade barrier based on driving beyond California’s borders. It does not respect the autonomy of California’s sister states,” Kneedler said.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett asked Kneedler how this differs from a New York state law requiring out-of-state firewood to be treated with a pesticide. Kneedler said raising pigs in crates does not create a “legitimate state interest” in preventing harm to citizens the way the sale of untreated firewood does.

Optional legend

Scott Olson via Getty Images

The impact on small farmers and consumers

Michael Mongan, the state solicitor general, represented California in oral argument. He argued that Proposition 12 was democratically chosen by 63% of Californians in a vote and that it protected both animals and humans from harmful diseases caused by raising pigs in crates.

Both sides had differing views on how Proposal 12 will affect small-scale farmers. Judge Samuel Alito asked Mongan whether small-scale pork producers would bear the brunt of the financial impact, as claimed by the NPPC and AFBF. Mongan said this is the opposite of what is happening and farmers who want to comply with Proposition 12 standards actually benefit.

“Small pork producers can choose to get a substantial premium for producing this type of specialty product [crate-free pork] or continue to produce for the other 49 states, exactly as many of their own members, as the complaint acknowledges, have decided to do,” Mongan said.

Josh Balk, vice president of animal welfare at the Humane Society, told Food Dive after the closing arguments that the pork industry had failed to prove its case. He argued that Californians shouldn’t be forced to buy pork raised in crate boxes because it can cause foodborne illness, citing claims from scientific analysts.

“When it comes to public health and food safety, states have always had the ability to ban certain products, and this case is no different,” Balk said. “The sale of pork from farms that confine a mother pig to a crate so small that she is unable to roll over is unsafe and poses threats to public health.”

Farm groups, however, refuted the argument that Proposition 12 is about health and safety.

Jonathan Urick, associate chief counsel at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Litigation Center and one of the lead attorneys in the case, told Food Dive it comes down to a big state trying to impose its economic weight and its policies to the other 49.